Search for: "United States v. Rivera" Results 201 - 220 of 324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
De YoungCase number: 14-cv-00309 (United States District Court for the District of Utah)Case filed: April 24, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 21, 2016 5/31/2016 8/29/2016 2016-73 SEC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6357, Rivera v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 6:54 pm by Earl Drott
In cases in which a party asserts they are protected from liability via governmental immunity, the courts will weigh several factors to determine whether the assertion is true, as illustrated in Rivera v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
OATH found that Bey and his co-plaintiffs were guilty of all charges filed against them except their alleged "disclaiming of their United States citizenship. [read post]
15 May 2011, 8:05 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 49270, March 10, 2011) and  dismissed a prisoner's claim that he was required, in violation of the Establishment Clause, to attend a faith-based AA and NA program as a condition of parole.In Rivera v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:45 am by David G. Badertscher
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Transmitting Conviction Supported Even If Firm Not 'Domestic Financial Institution' United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:10 pm
" The case is Hispanics United of Buffalo v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Moreover, applying the Supreme Court’s 1995 opinion in Wyoming v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:05 pm by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Sánchez Valle, 2015 T.S.P.R. 25, y la opinión concurrente del juez Juan Torruella en United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:21 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Carmen Márquez and Ilianys Rivera. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am by SHG
United States v Powell, 469 US 57, 63 [1984], citing Harris v Rivera, 454 US 339, 346 [1981] [a jury has the "unreviewable power . . . to return a verdict of not guilty for impermissible reasons"]). [read post]