Search for: "United States v. Rosenberg" Results 201 - 220 of 241
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
                  Cheerleading as a Sport under Title IX Approximately half of the U.S. states have already recognized high school cheerleading under Title IX.[11]  Cheerleading has grown significantly in popularity among women, almost 25%, since 2000.[12]  Cheerleading’s largest barrier to achieving… [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
  Danielle Parr, Entertainment Software Association of Canada Anti-circumvention provisions, Canadian piracy of video games is disproportionate to the United States, TPMs used for more than preventing piracy. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
  Danielle Parr, Entertainment Software Association of Canada Anti-circumvention provisions, Canadian piracy of video games is disproportionate to the United States, TPMs used for more than preventing piracy. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 11:33 pm
Rosenberg, 195 F.2d 583 (U.S. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:33 am
Estis, a founding partner at Rosenberg & Estis, and Jeffrey Turkel, a partner at the firm, review the recent First Department case of Hirsch v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The head of the Manhattan DA's elder abuse unit said Marshall and lawyer Francis X. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
Legal scholarship: First Statute of Westminster [1275] is cited in attorney's briefAmalfitano v Rosenberg, 2009 NY Slip Op 01069, Decided on February 12, 2009, Court of AppealsPrecedents and legislative history are frequently referred to in briefs and court decisions. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 2:57 am
Van Ru Credit Corp., 109 F.3d 338, 346 (7th Cir.1997)(stating that “[t]he application of Rule 23 does not abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right”); In re Baldwin-United Corp., 770 F.2d 328, 335 (2d Cir.1985)(stating that the federal class-action procedure set forth in Rule 23 “is a rule of procedure and creates no substantive rights or remedies enforceable in federal court”); Southwestern Refining Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:47 pm
Approximately 35,000 women in the United States used the Mentor ObTape between 2003 and 2006 for stress urinary incontinence. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:27 am
Oct. 15, 2008), a unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment granted to Bayer by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, holding that Bayer’s settlement of patent litigation with a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer did not violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 7:49 pm
Oct. 15, 2008), a unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment granted to Bayer by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, holding that Bayer's settlement of patent litigation with a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer did not violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
Gregory The Significance of Sprint/United Management Company v. [read post]