Search for: "United States v. Sanchez" Results 201 - 220 of 518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Amy Howe
” At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice and Comment, Daniel Hemel discusses United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Citing a DC Circuit case United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:05 pm by Albert Wan
 In a sort of unusual procedural backdrop, the petitioner in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:58 am by Andrew Frisch
 The current regulation has previously been upheld by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Long Island Care at Home, LTD. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Greenberg, represented Jose Sanchez and Antonio Mejia Palacio in an action commenced in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against, among others, Ethan Sage and Oceanside First Class Roofing, Inc., inter alia, to recover damages for unpaid overtime wages and for failure to provide wage statement notices as required by Labor Law § 195(3). [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 9:25 am by Steve Jumes
As recently as December of 2016, the federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reiterated this legal tenet in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 5:24 pm by David Markus
 Here’s the review from SCOTUSBlog:The first case for argument in the Supreme Court this morning has a very interesting underlying issue: whether a policy of shackling all criminal defendants at pretrial appearances in a federal district court is constitutional.But as United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]