Search for: "United States v. Steven Stands"
Results 201 - 220
of 836
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
United States Postal Service, et al. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 8:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Background: State Sovereign Immunity The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 5:15 am
In this scenario, the court will issue an order in which it invites the U.S. solicitor general, the government’s chief lawyer before the Supreme Court, to file a brief “expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:19 am
In Reed v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:06 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
That amendment provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
4 May 2019, 5:37 pm
(But not restitution).United States v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
If you were to ask the average citizen what values define the United States, the answer would likely include the right to speak freely without fear of government censorship and a general commitment to a free press. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
The significance is not so much, as Sir John Stevens concluded in 2003, that the murder could have been prevented, though I entirely concur with this finding. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
Raskin introduced the stand-alone version of the Shareholders United Act, he observed that even if shareholders have a right to voice their concerns about corporate political spending, the money they invest still should not be used without their consent. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Thaddeus Stevens,18 wanted to grant freed slaves full civil rights, both out of moral sentiment and to create a Republican power base.19 The “black codes”20 and laws that denied freedmen entry into the states21 hampered the Radicals’ goals, as did Supreme Court precedent favoring states rights (often regarding slavery).22 After President Johnson vetoed23 a civil rights bill24 that would have eliminated the black codes, Stevens sought to usurp power from… [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:56 pm
The basic question in the case is whether the United States government (here the USPS) counts as “a person who is not the owner of a patent. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
United States). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
The political economy of international standard setting in financial reporting: how the United States led the adoption of IFRS across the world. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
This question was left unanswered for a very long time, until the United States Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) resolved it in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm
And “no matter how the broader issue of” whether courts should generally review partisan-gerrymandering claims is resolved, they contended, this is such an easy case that the 2016 plan cannot stand: North Carolina Republicans had an “official state policy to maximize” their party’s representation in Congress, and under the plan Republicans in 2016 won 10 out of the state’s 13 congressional seats “even though the statewide vote was… [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
”), and Steven Weinstein (“Weinstein Tr. [read post]
