Search for: "United States v. Two Firearms Seized"
Results 201 - 220
of 273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/07/11/10-50240.pdf United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 3:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
No Miranda warnings were given to either the defendant or the driver before the crack cocaine was seized. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:16 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/64958-2.pub.doc.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals: State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
United States of America v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:54 am
The Supreme Court held in Brady v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/835705.opn.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:14 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/828687.no1.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals: State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:33 am
[They] seized numerous items, including . . . six computers, multiple USB thumb drives, USB cables, a Sony Playstation, two digital cameras, multiple external hard drives, a cassette recorder, two USB cameras, numerous compact discs, a pair of handcuffs, condoms, three marijuana pipes, a handgun, ammunition, and over seventy grams of marijuana. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 6:49 am
” United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
A member of the military forces of the United States or of any state of the United States in the performance of official duties; or 3. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
As to his sentence, Hernandez argues the trial court should have stayed two of his sentences under Penal Code section 654.[ 2 ] He contends the section 654 stay requirement must be applied to (1) one of two convictions for firearm possession by a felon, and (2) a burglary conviction as incidental to an assault conviction. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
As used in this paragraph, "laser sighting system or device" means any system or device that is integrated with or affixed to a firearm and emits a laser light beam that is used to assist in the sight alignment or aiming of the firearm. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:51 pm
Under the United States Supreme Court interpretation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the defendant was clearly not seized as the United States Supreme Court held in a case called California v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:30 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]