Search for: "United States v. Victor" Results 201 - 220 of 428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  But if you didn’t know the history of “The Victors,” you might have thought the lyrics were written by Bexis. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm by Neil Cahn
She arrived in the United States in 1981, at the age of twenty-one. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:33 am by Alex Vitrak
Through well-established executive authority, the administration will temporarily spare youth educated in America’s schools from expulsion from the United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, in which the court struck down the federal law that bars states from legalizing sports betting, is “a watershed moment that dramatically alters the landscape of the gaming industry in the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
On January 1, 2024, Peter Pan will finally enter the public domain in the United States—but not in Barrie’s native United Kingdom. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 2:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
GABAY, Defendant.;10 Civ. 3473 (PGG);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2011 U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
On July 31, Duenas met Victor Garcia. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I have strongly urged that “comparative constitutionalists” pay more attention to the “other” fifty constitutions in the United States, i.e., the state constitutions that are, in fact, both important and interesting in their own right. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 5:00 pm
Indeed, I saw a headline this morning mentioning as many as 100,000 more deaths in the United States in the next six months. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:44 pm by Robert J. McKennon
In a 9-0 decision authored by Justice Thomas, the United States Supreme Court reversed, holding that because Section 1132(g)(1) does not use the term “prevailing party,” district court judges have discretion to award attorneys’ fees to either party, even in a situation where there is no judgment in favor of the plan participant. [read post]