Search for: "United States v. Vigil" Results 201 - 220 of 547
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2017, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (16-1466), takes the opposite position from DOJ’s amicus brief filed two years earlier, in Friedrichs v California Teachers Association (14-915), to argue that it is time to overturn Abood v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The entire statement is reprinted below: Supreme Court of the United States Christopher Anthony Floyd v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
For reasons that confound, the employer decided it was a good idea to challenge the removal petition - the case originated in State court - on the grounds that removal jurisdiction violated Article I, § 10 of the United States Constitution - the so-called impairment-of-contracts clause. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:39 am by Minick Law
A stop in this circumstance can be contested with the Fourth Amendment of the United Stated Constitution which protects its citizens “against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:48 am by Anton Metlitsky
 He filed an amicus brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and other organizations in support of neither party in Jesner v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Ransomware attacks have grown almost exponentially for several reasons: The ransomware business model works, with the FBI stating that ransomware is on pace to become a one billion dollar source of income for cybercriminals in 2017;  Ransomware start-up costs are cheap. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 am by Scott Bomboy
The Colorado state supreme court didn’t accept Phillips’ appeal and his attorneys then petitioned the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:07 am by Josh Blackman
These difficulties are amplified exponentially when the client is the President of the United States, and he continuously sabotages his lawyers, who are struggling to defend his policies in an already-hostile arena. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am by Peter Margulies
The “it” in Giuliani’s explanation could also refer to pausing certain immigration temporarily, in order to assess whether the United States’ current criteria for screening immigrants actually work. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:01 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Perhaps most notably, the elite mainstream media has repeatedly covered the problem of the unbefriended in the United States. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm by Steve Vladeck, Benjamin Wittes
In light of those immunity doctrines and the unique structural role and constitutional status of the President of the United States, the Court concluded that Nixon was “entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:59 am by Brian Cordery
She addressed the state of implementation of the Agreement. 12 have ratified so far but not Germany and the UK. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm by Morgan Weiland
Chafee, Zechariah, Freedom of Speech in War Time (1919). ______________, Free Speech in the United States (1941). [read post]