Search for: "United States v. Wiley"
Results 201 - 220
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm
Wiley, the United States Supreme Court dealt with the same issue. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:20 am
An academic dream: the Supreme Court of the United States cited the comment that my former student Lina Monten wrote in 2005, and that we published in the Marquette Intellectual Property Review. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:42 am
Wiley alleged that selling the foreign textbooks in the United States infringed its U.S. copyrights on its American editions. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
John Wiley & Sons. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 4:16 am
Supap Kirtsaeng moved from Thailand to the United States to study mathematics at Cornell University. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:18 pm
” More about the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:28 am
Wiley and Sons, Inc., the Supreme Court held 6-3 that the first sale doctrine of Section 109(a) of the Copyright Act trumps a copyright owner’s right under Section 602(a)(1) to bar importation of copies when they were made and sold outside the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm
Kirtsaeng bought textbooks in Thailand, where they are cheap, brought them to the United States, and resold them at a large profit. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm
Supap Kirtsaeng was a Thai student in the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:02 pm
A word search shows this is only the fifth time a Supreme Court opinion has mentioned the WTO, along with Crosby v NFTC (2000), JEM Ag Supply v Pioneer Hi-Bred (2001), United Haulers v Oneida-Herkimer (2007), and Golan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:39 am
The Supreme Court of the United States issued its much-anticipated decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
