Search for: "Unknown Defendants 1 -10" Results 201 - 220 of 1,495
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
 The court ruled that the settlement “provides no meaningful benefit to the class” because it “abandons the monetary relief requested” in the complaint, and had all three hallmarks of a potentially collusive settlement: (1) counsel’s receipt of a disproportionate distribution of the settlement, (2) a “clear sailing” arrangement by which the defendant agreed not to oppose the request for attorney’s fees, and (3) a provisions that… [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 8:45 am by Eric Goldman
YouTube precedent holding that YouTube isn’t a state actor) rather than the comparatively unknown 11th Circuit. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 7:00 am by Rainer Winters
The highly problematic collaboration is a cocktail that threatens democracy with a hitherto unknown level of contempt. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 7:00 am by Rainer Winters
The highly problematic collaboration is a cocktail that threatens democracy with a hitherto unknown level of contempt. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:51 am by Kory A. Crichton
Defendant appealed three (3) Family Part orders which (1) denied his motion to reopen an arbitration award; (2) denied his motion for reconsideration; and, (3) denied his motion to modify his child support obligation. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm by Bill Pratt
This is since it is not uncommon for the deceased successor in interest to not be apparent or easily contacted, or for the deceased to be a defendant whose relationships are unknown or family members have no interest in facilitating the litigation. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:51 am by INFORRM
These pictures were, it seems, captured by a CCTV camera in the office and leaked by person(s) unknown to the newspaper. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:19 pm by Bona Law PC
We litigate as plaintiffs and defendants, handle antitrust issues for mergers and acquisitions, and offer antitrust counseling. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 6:50 am by Jimerson Birr
Property owners can only name the following defendants in a quiet title action: (1) known defendants for a cloud of a known or an unknown nature; and (2) unknown defendants for a cloud of a known nature. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 2:42 pm by Jennifer Lynch
Finally, it states explicitly that criminal defendants may use the technique as well to support their defense (but places similar restrictions on use). [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:18 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
The petition identifies a 4-3 circuit split on the issue, with four circuits requiring pretrial detainees to plead and prove that the jail defendants subjectively knew their deficient treatment would pose a substantial risk of serious harm, and three circuits not requiring pretrial-detainee plaintiffs to establish the defendants’ state of mind. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:52 pm by Eric Halliday, Rachael Hanna
§ 2331(1)) or domestic terrorism (as defined by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:47 am by Hannah Zhao
Prosecutors often describe the analysis from these programs this way: It is X times more likely that defendant, rather than a random person, contributed to this DNA mixture sample. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 10:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Gottwald has only spoken out once regarding this litigation, on Twitter in 2016, and has limited his involvement to what was necessary to defend himself. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 9:21 am
This Congress is particularly interesting, and potentially important, as a result of the convergence of several factors.1. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:39 am by anne
While defendants were ordered to pay $143 million in restitution and $429 million as a civil penalty, the court’s order was issued in Reynolds’ absence; his location is unknown. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Eve Gaumond
  The case was brought by the Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF), a registered charity that defends the rights and freedoms of Canadians through litigation. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 8:59 am by Lee E. Berlik
The particularity of that grievance could well have led ODW to conclude that Defendant “is privy to facts about [Plaintiff] that are unknown to [ODW]. [read post]