Search for: "Unknown Plaintiff v. Unknown Defendant" Results 201 - 220 of 1,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2010, 1:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While pre-action disclosure is often thought of as a device to enable the plaintiff to frame a complaint (see generally Matter of Wien & Malkin v Wichman, 255 AD2d 244 [1998]; Matter of Perez v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 6:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"In dismissing this case, the district court reasoned as follows: this is not a case in which Plaintiff points to a white co-worker who was not fired after engaging in conduct that, while unknown, reasonably appears to have been comparable to the conduct in which Plaintiff engaged. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 6:27 am by Andrew Frisch
The provision does not track the breadth of the allegations in this action and releases unrelated claims, whether known or unknown, that the Plaintiffs may have against Defendant. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 6:06 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court has held that when an alleged consumer fraud consists of an omission of material fact, the plaintiff must show that the defendant acted with knowledge, and intent is an essential element. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
For a final post on Jones v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The defendant acknowledges that he is aware of the plaintiff's identity, so even if the plaintiff's name is not disclosed in court filings, the defendant is not being anonymously accused by an unknown plaintiff…. [read post]