Search for: "Unknown Plaintiff v. Unknown Defendant"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2022, 6:01 am
"] From Judge Stephanie Gallagher's opinion Thursday in Cottman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:00 pm
Citing to Doe v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 12:48 pm
There is no indication that anyone associated with any defendant, knowing Plaintiffs' identities, has threatened or harmed any plaintiff, other than as alleged in the Amended Complaint…. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:09 pm
FTC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 12:14 pm
"] From B.S. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 2:46 pm
June 7, 2017) (concluding that the defendants had carried their burden of demonstrating that plaintiff had agreed to arbitration by signing his name on an electronic pen pad). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 3:50 pm
And from today's Report and Recommendation in Hubbard v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 10:11 am
In Hogan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
The Supreme Court(1) directed the defendant to pay the plaintiff maintenance of $1,438.82 per month for 36 months, (2) awarded the plaintiff sole legal and residential custody of the parties’ two children, with certain parental access to the defendant, and (3) directed the defendant to pay the plaintiff child support of $1,774.67 per month. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
[21] Conversely, if you're a plaintiff, you might want to research the defendant: Have there been past verdicts against the defendant in similar past cases? [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm
By contrast in Morgan, the plaintiff/petitioner claims that the U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
To give one example, consider Doe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:26 am
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics are disfavored and have been construed narrowly for years. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm
The ubiquity of the desire for privacy: I noted above that very many litigants, plaintiffs and defendants, would prefer to keep their names out of the court record and therefore off Google and out of the newspapers. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:16 am
What’s notable about this ruling isn’t that it presents any novel issue for pre-action discovery per se, even if the putative defendant’s connection to Westchester seems to defy long-arm jurisdiction, but that it fails to distinguish between pre-action discovery under ordinary circumstances, such as where the identities of unknown defendants are otherwise public but merely not known as yet by the plaintiff, from intentionally anonymous writing. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
The case is New Line Cinema v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 6:52 pm
V. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Kehm v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:35 am
* Citing SolarCity Corp. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
The defendant acknowledges that he is aware of the plaintiff's identity, so even if the plaintiff's name is not disclosed in court filings, the defendant is not being anonymously accused by an unknown plaintiff…. [read post]
