Search for: "Victor v. Victor"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2010, 1:57 pm
The "Witt standard" comes from a significant 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision (PDF) in an ACLU of Washington case, Witt v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
In Brady v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:07 am
Similarly, the Court embraced the previously defunct argument that the single color of a product is not capable of protection because of the risk of "shade confusion," which argument had been explicitly rejected by the Supreme Court in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm
By Jaclyn McNamara and Marisa Victor Your employees have access to all kinds of sensitive company information. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:34 am
Barker)*March 17, 2007, letter of Victor B. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:20 am
For example, Arma Partners LLP v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:06 am
Olesegun Victor Ibitoye v Hasbro Inc, Case O-382-13 is the second appeal from the UK's Trade Mark Registry to an Appointed Person to get a mention on this weblog today. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 6:59 am
At ABC News (via How Appealing), Devin Dwyer reports that a number of high-profile grassroots campaigns have been announced to combat partisan gerrymandering in light of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Rucho v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:04 am
Cochran of Greensboro urged the Court to reconsider its 2005 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 2:00 am
You can see the whole case, Santana v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:00 pm
For more information, please see Stambovsky v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 8:00 am
Underwood v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 10:00 am
One such case is Stanley v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:05 am
From Taylor v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:51 pm
” Bonanni Ship Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 12:00 pm
"State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:50 pm
Whitmill v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:56 pm
Whitmill v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
On June 18, 2014, Judge Victor Marrero of the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:22 am
“No”, said the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Hinke v. [read post]
