Search for: "W Retreat " Results 201 - 220 of 349
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2012, 9:57 am by Larry Golub
 Once again, while the original decision found the doctrine did not apply in third party cases, the amended decision advised: “[w]e need not resolve” this legal issue. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:52 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Goodhart didn't quite get the reference, Justice Kennedy made it plainer: "[w]ell, what you're saying is that it can't make the change without paying, right? [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
©Charles Fried, 2012 Chief Justice Roberts, in his confirmation hearing, famously analogized the role of the judge to an umpire, calling balls and strikes. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
North Dakota had done so but retreated from this unwise course in 1989 by abandoning a strict liability regime and amending its drug laws to include the culpability requirement of “willfully” as an element of the offense. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:18 am by William A. Ruskin
Rogers, a partner with Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP in Columbia, South Carolina; James W. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:20 pm by Stephen Fairley
An op-ed piece entitled The Law Firm Business Model is Dying appeared yesterday on the Wall Street Journal’s website authored by Clifford Winston and Robert W. [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:05 am by Jeralyn
He continued walking towards the front of the Retreat View Circle, where the first house is 2861, home to W-13 and W-12. [read post]
23 May 2012, 11:39 am by Jeralyn
W-2: Towards the T Serino: So away from our house W-2: No Serino: You live in that row on Retreat View, right? [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/IMDynN (PLG, University of Waterloo) New Order Update: Peck, Parties and Predictive Coding (1313 Pages Consolidated w/Index) bit.ly/xAztDv (@ComplexD) Reporting Numbers? [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Should treat right to copy as a co-equal participant in the system; otherwise competition simply retreats as rights expands. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
Noting the congressional intent to limit attorney’s fee awards to cases in which parties dispute the existence or extent of liability, the court stated, “[w]e do not believe that the statute contemplates the making of a written recommendation by the deputy commissioner as a precondition to the imposition of liability for attorney’s fees.”  [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  Noting the congressional intent to limit attorney’s fee awards to cases in which parties dispute the existence or extent of liability, the court stated, “[w]e do not believe that the statute contemplates the making of a written recommendation by the deputy commissioner as a precondition to the imposition of liability for attorney’s fees. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:59 am by Eugene Volokh
Here’s an excerpt from the judge’s decision: [W]hile the Government presented evidence of vile and often hateful speech, and may have even shown that certain Defendants conspired to commit some crime — perhaps to murder local law enforcement — offensive speech and a conspiracy to do something other than forcibly resist a positive show of authority by the Federal Government is not enough to sustain a charge of seditious conspiracy. [read post]