Search for: "W. T. Grant Co., Matter of"
Results 201 - 220
of 850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
This basic question has three different answers, all regularly used in any given jurisdiction—this is not a matter of circuit splits. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
Delaware & Hudson Co., 213 U.S. 366, 408 (1909))"This case is important to the thousands of businesses that are the targets of patent assertion entities, also called patent monetization entities. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:31 am
With James W. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
ADJUDGED that the petition is granted, on the law and as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that the award of back pay is reduced from the principal sum of $69,865.64 to the principal sum of $17,779.91, plus interest at the rate of 9% per year from November 8, 2013, the award of compensatory damages for mental anguish is reduced from the principal sum of $40,000 to the principal sum of $10,000, plus interest at the rate of 9% per year from April… [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
ADJUDGED that the petition is granted, on the law and as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that the award of back pay is reduced from the principal sum of $69,865.64 to the principal sum of $17,779.91, plus interest at the rate of 9% per year from November 8, 2013, the award of compensatory damages for mental anguish is reduced from the principal sum of $40,000 to the principal sum of $10,000, plus interest at the rate of 9% per year from April… [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Aug. 13, 2009) (“[i]t remains Plaintiff’s burden to prove that defendant’s failure to warn was a pro [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:24 am
After the FTC sued in 2008, the district court granted summary judgment on liability, holding that the challenged infomercials were misleading as a matter of law. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
Tulsa Co. [read post]
“No License, No Problem” – Is Qualcomm’s Ninth Circuit Antitrust Victory a Patent Exhaustion Defeat?
1 Sep 2020, 7:35 am
As the Supreme Court reasoned in De Forest Radio Telephone Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:38 pm
Ourada, 972 NE 2d 744 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 2012 On a question of law, it doesn’t matter how wrong the trial court was. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Hill & Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 10:44 am
The multiple uses went outside the safe harbor, which was for a single use, but didn’t violate the order. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Co. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
It puts other people uncomfortably in the middle of the friction between you and your ex-wife and they don't want to hear that. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:57 am
., Christopher DeGroff, and Alex W. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 5:05 am
[T]he trial court issued an order that granted Mother's petition and stated, in part, as follows: … [Father] and [Stepmother] shall NOT use online or web-based communications to discuss this matter…. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
These reasons include: the claimed matter is functional, meaning it affects the cost or quality of the product or service; the claimed matter is merely descriptive, meaning that consumers don’t understand that it indicates source and instead think that it just describes some characteristic of the product; the claimed matter is deceptively misdescriptive, which is like descriptiveness except not true; the claimed matter is deceptive; the… [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:17 am
Nintendo Co. [read post]
