Search for: "WEEKS v. WILLIAMS" Results 201 - 220 of 4,052
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2009, 9:59 pm
(We learned of an additional amicus brief that was filed last week, this one by William Mitchell College of Law in support of Defendant-Appellant-Respondent Eli Lilly & Co., which brings the total number of amicus briefs filed in the rehearing en banc to twenty-five, and the number filed in support of Lilly and/or affirmance to nineteen.) [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 6:10 am by Benjamin Bissell
Jane noted that the DC Circuit issued a per curiam order this week that denied the detainees’ petition for an en banc rehearing in Hatim v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:10 am
WhatcottHuman rights: William Whatcott distributed flyers on behalf of the Christian Truth Activists to homes in Saskatoon and Regina that denounced the sexual practices of same-sex partners. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 10:13 am by David Headrick
AUNDREY MEALS, as Natural Parent, Guardian, and Next Friend of WILLIAM MEALS v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 2:44 pm
Lawyer2Lawyer welcomes Attorney Thomas V. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 3:07 am by Robin Shea
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Williams v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:19 pm by David Kopel
(David Kopel) Filed earlier this week by Stephen Halbrook, in the case of Williams v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
Williams (07-1216) and Knowles v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:09 pm
In June 2004, about a week before the Supreme Court decided Blakely, District Judge William Young of the District of Massachusetts issued this remarkable 174-page opinion in US v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Lev Sugarman
Pildes unpacked the implications of the 1983 INS v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:07 am by Daniel O'Rielly
Williams Sonoma Stores, Inc., the California Supreme Court last week held that requesting and recording a credit cardholder's ZIP Code violates the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (Civ. [read post]
16 May 2015, 6:55 am by Sebastian Brady
Last week, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in ACLU v. [read post]