Search for: "WONDERS v. ARMY "
Results 201 - 220
of 239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Army Corps of Engineers for another look. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 1:45 pm
US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:03 am
This post is not very exciting, unless you are a government employee wondering whether you are covered by this section. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:55 am
We were talking about arbitrators (don't ask) and he wondered how they can know who's telling the truth. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:52 pm
Some also feel that the police are a kind of army of occupation who shouldn't get their co-operation.The slogan “stop snitching” gained cultural traction via hip-hop songs and a popular line of clothing that the mayor of Boston once tried to ban from stores. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:27 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 11:33 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:22 pm
In Van Devent v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:33 am
I also explore the recent circuit court decisions on Don’t Ask Don’t Tell which interestingly set the stage for President Obama’s first executive decision on the issue - whether to seek certiorari in Witt v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:05 pm
Powered by a wonderful champagne just a few minutes ago, here are the short version of mine: At LEAST 10% of the AmLaw 100 law firms will fold by the end of 2009 - the era of the megafirm is over. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 9:40 pm
ARMY 20060976. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 2:54 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 9:24 pm
New v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 1:44 am
For example, in Lopez v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 9:07 pm
ARMY 20060128 (A. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 3:40 am
The first, a case involving the Army's prohibition on the use of doctors [and others] on court-martial panels in AR 27-10, was predicted by our house psychic, Grover the Magnificent, here:United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 9:39 pm
Among them: Roe v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 11:17 am
ARMY 20051215 and ARMY 20051331 (A. [read post]