Search for: "Walk v. Ohio Supreme Court" Results 201 - 220 of 404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
—, 144 S.Ct. 717 (March 15, 2024)(per curiam), the Supreme Court grappled with whether exercising such custodial control constituted “state action” for purposes of 42 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
  But two years back the Court says in Oregon v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 8:30 am
""Lynch," is the Supreme Court case, Lynch v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 8:30 am
""Lynch," is the Supreme Court case, Lynch v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:15 pm
While public schools can regulate student speech that substantially disrupts the functioning of the school, as the Supreme Court held in the landmark 1969 case Tinker v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am by MBettman
” Justice DeGenaro, to the assistant prosecutor On July 31, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of In re L.G. (2017-0877). [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:34 am
  The case had been up to the Supreme Court twice before; this time the Court simply denied certiorari, letting stand the 3rd Circuit’s decision affirming the trial court’s decision that the law violated the 1st Amendment. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:23 am by David Post
(David Post) Over the summer, I wrote a piece about the Supreme Court’s decision in the “violent videogames” case (Brown vs Entertainment Merchants Assn) for the forthcoming Cato 2011 Supreme Court Review. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:56 pm
Trachtenberg suggests that Davis would have "walk[ed]" if the Supreme Court had come out the other way in his case. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:09 am by David S. Kemp
Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
To that end, the court walks through a number of statements made by Donald Trump and his associates, both before and after the inauguration, to establish this improper purpose. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 7:08 am by Susan Brenner
LaMar, 95 Ohio St.3d 181, 767 N.E.2d 166 [(Ohio Supreme Court 2002)]. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  So a couple weeks back, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Bailey v. [read post]