Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 201 - 220
of 336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm
And unlike Judge Watford, I don't think that's a reason to rethink -- or overrule -- existing circuit precedent.We are where we are because of the deal the state made. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:24 pm
It didn't come from Noling or his co-defendant, which proves nothing. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:55 pm
We will represent you. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:41 am
Don't be put off trying to get together a passing-off claim, even if you are also running a trade mark infringement action. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:14 am
Similarly, defendants in tort actions should be judged by what is reasonable, not what everyone else is doing. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:38 am
And on that basis, I find the Defendant guilty. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
If you don't, like Lilly's lawyers did, you may be unwittingly accepting service for the other IP rights (no matter how harsh). [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 1:45 pm
And while affected cases won't be subject to mandatory minimums, it is likely that defendants will still face prison time, albeit less of it. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm
Among those is a rule that allows family members to act on behalf of defendants in debt suits filed in those courts, though it requires the judge's permission, and the "representation" is limited. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:09 am
“We’re definitely appealing. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:34 pm
The judge had been a solo lawyer for a while, he had been a public defender, and then he became a judge. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:24 pm
O’Connor and Judge Tallman. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Which left Plaintiff with no case and Judge Miller granted Defendant's motion for summary judgment. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am
As Judge Posner noted in the Seventh Circuit's opinion: We don't understand why all three cases were not assigned to the same judge. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:18 am
When Ramey’s attorney objected “to the remarks”, the trial judge gave the jury this “limiting instruction”: `The Court: I just want to instruct you you're not to consider any reference to any evidence or suggestion that the Defendant chose or didn't make a statement to the police. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 12:08 am
Except that criminal defendants don't have a great lobby and money for the accused never seems to be a budget priority.So it's defense on the cheap. [read post]
23 May 2013, 12:21 pm
ViewSonic defended itself inexpensively. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
We then got the en banc panel. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 5:08 pm
I'd even corresponded with the interviewer, at his request, about what topics we should cover. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 10:40 am
Since finding the identity of an infringer generally requires a lawsuit and lawsuits, as we mentioned above, are expensive, these companies often attempt to reduce the amount they spend by rolling up hundreds or even thousands of defendants into one lawsuit. [read post]
