Search for: "Welcome v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 6,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix.
The handing down of the decision in Kambadzi (previously SK Zimbabwe) relatively shortly after Lumba is welcomed not least given that the Lumba judgment seemed to have caused some confusion amongst lawyers acting for the Secretary of State as to its ratio and led to some novel arguments being asserted as to the correct test for false imprisonment. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:07 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Nancy Welsh (nxw10@DSL.PSU.EDU) of Penn State, Dickinson School of Law has announced the following conference:On Friday, March 26, 2010, Penn State will hold a symposium addressingthe Supreme Court's recent decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
The opinion of Gorsuch J for the US Supreme Court in 303 Creative LLC v Elenis 600 US (2023) (Opinion (pdf) | Justia) has been widely welcomed on the US political right as a victory religious rights and just as broadly deplored on the US political left as a defeat for LGBTQ+ rights. [read post]
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm by Lovechilde
  In a welcome contrast to AIPAC, it "gives political voice to mainstream American Jews and other supporters of Israel who, informed by their Jewish values, believe that a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is essential to Israel’s survival as the national home of the Jewish people and as a vibrant democracy. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 1:31 pm by Cassandra Burke Robertson
Today’s Supreme Court decision in Animal Science Products v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:10 am
United States (Opinion, United States Supreme Court, No, 20-1195 / February 28, 2023)   DOJ RELEASES   Niagara Falls Woman Going... [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:44 pm by Ronald Mann
Rarely have I read a set of opinions that so closely tracked the discussion at oral argument as the opinions this morning in Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v Lundgren. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:16 pm by uwlegalscholarship
The organizers welcome papers from scholars and practitioners (sorry, no student papers) exploring the multiple dimensions of these cases, including implications both in the United States and abroad. [read post]