Search for: "Wells v. State Farm Mutual" Results 201 - 220 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2008, 5:30 pm
The Sentencing Guidelines’ decision, United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm by Jennifer Simon, Esq.
  The case is captioned as Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 5:13 am by Russell Knight
The Illinois Supreme Court stated as recently as 2016 that “[i]t is well settled that the policy of the Marriage and Dissolution Act gives the state a strong continuing interest in the institution of marriage and the ability to prevent marriage from becoming in effect a private contract terminable at will, by disfavoring the grant of mutually enforceable property rights to knowingly unmarried cohabitants. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:29 pm by Scott R. Anderson
The Supreme Court affirmed as much in its 2015 decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
  As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:43 am
 Users of a Microsoft e-mail account can, with a user name and a password, send and receive email messages as well as store messages in personalized folders. . . . [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 1:30 pm by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
The Court of Appeal further reiterated how the “prevailing party” is the party who, on a practical level, achieved its main litigation goals (Heather Farms HOA v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
As found by the Federal Court in  State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:54 am by Bexis
”  In particular, we stated:[T]he committee’s proposed amendment also seeks to eliminate another well-known phrase, and overused phrase, “[r]elevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(v) Where necessary to protect health or safety, a claimant may commence immediate repairs to heating systems, hot water systems, and necessary electrical connections, as well as exterior windows, exterior doors, and, for minor permanent repairs, exterior walls, in order to enable property to retain heat, and any policy requirement that the policyholder exhibit the remains of the property may be satisfied by the policyholder submitting proof of loss documentation of the damaged or… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
(v) Where necessary to protect health or safety, a claimant may commence immediate repairs to heating systems, hot water systems, and necessary electrical connections, as well as exterior windows, exterior doors, and, for minor permanent repairs, exterior walls, in order to enable property to retain heat, and any policy requirement that the policyholder exhibit the remains of the property may be satisfied by the policyholder submitting proof of loss documentation of the damaged or… [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 10:49 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  The Times reports that the top three homeowners’ insurers in New York are State Farm, Allstate and Travelers. [read post]