Search for: "Wells v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc."
Results 201 - 220
of 488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2014, 5:32 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas recently denied certification of a putative securities law class after finding that plaintiff failed to put forth actual facts showing adequacy and predominance, as required to satisfy the “stringent standards” of Rule 23 pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm
The Background: The DFEH’s new authority came on the heels of two game changing decisions – Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:19 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:18 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:44 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, 163 F.Supp.2d 758 (2001). [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 8:54 am
Additional Resources: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 8:26 am
The class certification issues involved provide the Court an opportunity to build on its landmark decisions, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:47 am
Further, in an email citing concerns that one of the subcontractors was billing SLTD based on an hourly rate rather than a per-container rate, a Walmart manager asked, “what is this costing Wal-Mart? [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:34 am
More than any other development in 2013, the decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
Arizona District Court Certifies Class Of Lesbian And Gay State Employees In Denial Of Benefits Case
27 Dec 2013, 7:22 am
In support of the commonality requirement of Rule 23(a)(2), Plaintiffs cited directly to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:05 am
More than any other development in 2013, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in 2011 in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:51 am
Maechtlen While Wal-Mart scored a major victory for employers in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am
The ADA does not require an employer to place an employee on permanent light duty or give other workers an employee’s assignments to accommodate a physical impairment (Josey v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP). [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 11:37 am
Just two years ago, in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:37 am
Just two years ago, in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am
The bottom line is that the OFCCP will analyze current pay, so contractors should as well, he said, adding that contractors may want to analyze current pay for other reasons. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:46 am
In dissent, Judge Wilkinson argued that the majority’s decision had drained Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v Dukes of meaning. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 11:53 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
