Search for: "Wife, P. v. Husband, P."
Results 201 - 220
of 705
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Tweets are my own. (51) @VLJeker – V. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:00 am
Manago v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:00 am
Manago v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:26 am
State, 639 P.2d 547 (Nev. 1982) (ruling that the fact that a husband “often had difficulty achieving an erection” during sexual activity with his wife was not a communication protected by the privilege, as there was no intention to “convey meaning”). [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:26 am
State, 639 P.2d 547 (Nev. 1982) (ruling that the fact that a husband “often had difficulty achieving an erection” during sexual activity with his wife was not a communication protected by the privilege, as there was no intention to “convey meaning”). [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:33 pm
MICHAEL P. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
During closing argument, however, defense counsel denied the charges, asserting that, rather than defendant, it was defendant's wife who `ha[d] a motive to get revenge against her husband’ and `to humiliate [the victim]’ because defendant's wife `couldn't tolerate the fact that [defendant] was friends with [the victim]. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm
Last week I sent out a survey and asked the question, How The Heck Did YOU End Up in Workers’ Comp? [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:03 am
In Haynes v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
In her June 1, 2016 decision in B.W. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
In her June 1, 2016 decision in B.W. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:20 pm
In Tevis, the wife sued the husband for damages resulting from the husband physical beating the wife. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
As held in the case of Scarpuzza v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:48 pm
City of Pasadena, the plaintiffs were a husband and wife who attempted to cross the parking lot of an apartment complex. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:10 am
In Gomez v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
"Simmons v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
She and her husband would spend New Year’s Eve with Nino and his wife. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 5:11 pm
A will is of course ambulatory in nature, and the wife might have changed her will either before or after her husband's death. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
Ehly, 317 Or. 66, 75, 854 P.2d 421 (Oregon Supreme Court 1993). [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
A quick, non-exclusive list of common examples we frequently encounter are: Facts alleged by the declarant without foundation, i.e. without personal and direct sensory observation of the matter asserted (e.g. my husband smacked the child because I saw the child had a bruise when I picked her up from his house); Conclusory statements subject to less abstract, more specific ways of conveying the information (e.g. he is an abuser, or she is a liar); Legal conclusions that… [read post]
