Search for: "Wife, S. v. Husband, S." Results 201 - 220 of 6,187
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2007, 1:30 pm
Gross, reversed a trial court’s grant of a divorce based upon the husband’s cruel and inhuman treatment of the wife. [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:30 pm
Gross, reversed a trial court’s grant of a divorce based upon the husband’s cruel and inhuman treatment of the wife. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Gregory Forman
Finally, because Husband earns more than Wife and because Wife obtained permanent alimony, the Court of Appeals affirmed an award of attorney’s fees to Wife that amounted to almost 40% of Husbands property division award!?! [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 8:20 am by admin
 Although most of the couple’s income had been derived from the husbands withholdings, the bankruptcy court judge ruled that the husband and wife were each entitled to 50% of the tax refund, based on the case of Bass v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 4:30 am by koherston
Their marital dissolution agreement also contained a provision for adjusting Wifes alimony 2.5% […] [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 4:30 am by koherston
There marital dissolution agreement also contained a provision for adjusting Wifes alimony 2.5% […] [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 9:20 am by admin
As to the effect of bankruptcy, the wifes claim was provable in the husbands bankruptcy. [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:05 am by Diana L. Skaggs
The trial court ordered Wife to pay $8,000 towards Husbands attorney fees. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 6:30 am by K.O. Herston
Wife argued these entities, inherited from Husbands parents, were marital property rather than Husbands separate property. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:30 am by K.O. Herston
Husband was ordered to pay alimony in futuro of $2400 per month until Wifes death or remarriage. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:19 am
 However, the Family Court emphasized that Wife's alleged adultery had no impact on its division of assets.Teeter v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
The problem in Laura Ww. v Peter Ww was that the husband never signed the consent. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 5:33 am by Gregory Forman
On the issue of attorney’s fees the Fredrickson opinion lists Husbands arguments in favor of an award of fees and Wifes arguments opposing the award without analyzing any of them–simply affirming the family court’s denial of fees. [read post]