Search for: "Will v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 201 - 220 of 1,030
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The LSE Media Blog has an article on gender-based violence online, following the UN’s 16 Days of Activism against Gender-based violence. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 6:57 am by CharlesB
The post Executive Order Limits Wet Signature Requirement At Social Security appeared first on Greeman Toomey, PLLC. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:10 pm
  May your remaining years be filled with comfort, joy and security. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The Privacy and Information Security Law Blog produced a summary of the order this week. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
The social media site will still be called Facebook. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
The hearings,  "Protection from Persecution: Establishing Humanitarian Pathways for Hong Kongers and Uyghurs" is intended to be a "catalyst for passage of legislation offered in the 117th Congress to extend protections for Hong Kongers and Uyghurs facing a well-founded fear of persecution, including legislation offered by CECC Commissioners. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:53 am by Stewart Baker
  I give the highlights of two new and eminently contestable cyberlaw rulings:  In U.S. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am by Stewart Baker
I fear that as written it may criminalize ex-spies giving security advice to Airbus, or perhaps even the Atlantic Council. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 30 September 2021 judgment was handed down in Kate Wilson v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and National Police Chief’s Council [2021] UKIPTrib IPT/11/167/H. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:03 pm by Stewart Baker
Michael Weiner unpacks the new, amended complaint in FTC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:13 pm by Adam Levitin
These are just the rules of the game that everyone who sells securities to the public has to follow, and those rules are in place because of long experience with investor losses and negative social externalities when there haven't been the disclosures required by the registration process. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]