Search for: "Williams v. Scott*" Results 201 - 220 of 1,205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2020, 3:12 pm by David Oscar Markus
William Baude says yes in this Washington Post article and Josh Blackman argues no in this Newsweek piece. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
” It is hard to imagine John Marshall or William Howard Taft exciting such passionate responses. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 12:47 pm by ernst
Supreme Court's recent Eighth Amendment decision in Bucklew v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm by Matt Gluck
Nathaniel Sobel discussed the recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am by Stephen Griffin
  In the footnotes I mention the idea, advanced recently by William Baude and Stephen Sachs, that Brownwas in fact an originalist decision despite the Court’s apparent determination that historical evidence (a more neutral term than originalism) was no help.Baude and Sachs evidently disagree with my argument about Brown, but for all the work they have done to this point, it is not clear why. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 10:00 am by Ezra Rosser
Jay Cristol Professor ofBankruptcy Law, University of Miami School of Law Panelists: William E. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:18 pm by Ilya Somin
He is in this respect following in the footsteps of previous chiefs, including John Marshall and his own immediate predecessor William Rehnquist (for whom Roberts clerked). [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
Russo — in which he voted to adhere to Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 8:25 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Amanda Tyler compared this ruling to Boumediene v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicol J heard an application in the case of Depp v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:15 am by Adam Feldman
After Breyer joined the bench, the court’s membership was stable until Chief Justice William Rehnquist passed away in 2005. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 5:58 am by Fred Rocafort
Nine years later, in Williams v. [read post]