Search for: "Wilson v. Clarke" Results 201 - 220 of 258
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
In Courtroom 1, Gale and another v Serious Organised Crime Agency is to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Judge, Clarke, Dyson and Reed. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
There is only one Supreme Court appeal in the second week of the Easter Term, commencing with a two-day hearing of Autoclenz Limited v Belcher and others to be heard by Lords Hope, Walker, Collins, Clarke and Sir Nicholas Wilson on Wednesday 11 and Thursday 12 May 2011. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:10 am by Anita Davies
Wilson LJ will take up his position on 26 May. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:05 am by Chris Stott, Pannone LLP
On 5th May, a seven Justice Supreme Court, comprising Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke and, reflecting, coincidentally, the changes confirmed earlier this week, Lord Collins (who will shortly retire) and Lord Justice Wilson (who, on this occasion will sit as an acting Justice but who will be sworn in as a full time Justice on 26th May), will consider this issue in the case of R v Waya [2010] EWCA Crim 412. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am by Philip Thomas
On April 27, 2011 Hinds County Circuit Judge Winston Kidd issued a $500,000 bench trial verdict against the City of Jackson in Sandifer v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Clark, John Owen Haley.New Providence, N.J. : LexisNexis, c2010. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:04 pm
Elizabeth Holland, Suffolk University Law School in Boston, for "Holder v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am by admin
Moore Lincoln Boulevard, PO Box 249 Shawneetown, Illinois 62984-0249 Phone: 618/269-3140 Fax: 618/269-4324 Greene V. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm by NL
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm by NL
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]