Search for: "Withers v. Withers"
Results 201 - 220
of 361
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2012, 2:25 am
Bio-One, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
A recent example of that is the case of Feldman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:37 am
The Court’s cert. grant in Fisher v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:55 am
To paraphrase Bill Withers, "Ain't No Sunshine" (without pay).Tip of the hat to Courthouse News Service, which first reported on this case. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm
Elias LJ assessed the fees scheme not simply against the ECHR by also against the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) on the basis that the Court of Human Rights has, in recent cases, considered ECHR rights in light of the provisions of the Covenant (see Demir & Baykara v Turkey (2009) at [85] and Opuz v Turkey (2010) at [185]). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:13 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:22 am
Its position was bolstered by a unanimous judgment of the UK Supreme Court in R v Horncastle [2009] UKSC 14, [2010] 2 AC 373, in which the UK Supreme Court rejected various similar appeals, refused to follow the chamber decision, and subjected the “sole or decisive test” to withering criticism. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
The Second Circuit has vacated another conviction, this time on grounds that the defendant's lawyer was ineffective at trial.The case is Cornell v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
In Milton v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:36 am
Yancy and State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:25 am
Withers LLP v Langbar International Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1419; [2011] WLR (D) 351 “In asking whether money placed in the client account of a solicitor’s client were subject to a lien in favour of the solicitor the key question was whether the money had been placed in the account for general purposes or for a particular purpose which was incompatible with a lien arising.” WLR Daily, 5th December 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:57 pm
And the key authority they cite for that proposition is the Supreme Court’s 1982 decision in Upham v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
Kemp, supra, at 328-329; Crumbley v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 6:03 pm
His citation of Clark v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:44 pm
Judge Moore and Judge Kethledge fought both a legal battle and a snark battle in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:29 am
"I know they are permissible under the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in the Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:02 am
UK, Lee v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 10:51 am
By Eric Goldman Rothamel v. [read post]
