Search for: "York v. South Carolina"
Results 201 - 220
of 919
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm
In South Carolina v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
” South Carolina may have the Murdaughs, but Florida has the Adelsons. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:55 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
South Carolina Department of Corrections, 2009 U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 9:07 am
LEXIS 26397 (D SC, March 19, 2010), a South Carolina federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2010 U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
Prigg v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:21 am
Mickalis involved claims agains retail firearms dealers, one in South Carolina and one in Georgia. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:55 am
An irate Representative Brooks sought advice from fellow South Carolina Representative Laurence M. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
Those habeas claims, which challenged the legality of Padilla’s military detention at the Naval Consolidated Brig in South Carolina were, however, eventually made moot (after being re-filed in the District of South Carolina) when authorities transferred Padilla to civilian custody while he stood trial on criminal charges. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:44 am
On August 16, 2022, in Williams v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:26 pm
Thus, the All Saints Waccamaw case in the Diocese of South Carolina began in 2000 (it was not finally resolved until 2009). [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
Supp. 1309 (D.S.C. 1983) (interpreting South Carolina law); DiNatale v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 11:27 am
Three years later, “a South Carolina jury award[ed] the largest judgment ever against a hate group in Macedonia v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am
South Carolina in 1832 was political theater. it did some good, mainly because in those days the federal government depended on the cooperation of local officials to some degree, which it no longer does, and because there was a threat of secession (which occurred 29 years later anyway). [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
South Carolina, for example, passed a law in 1882 that required all potential voters to re-register, but delegated to election administrators broad discretion in determining voting eligibility. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 7:00 pm
Supreme Court’s decision to uphold Arizona’s mandatory E-Verify provisions in Chamber of Commerce v Whiting paved the way for similar laws in several states, including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, and Louisiana. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:05 pm
- New York lawyer Joseph I. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
California, New York, Kentucky, Ohio and South Carolina have taken a different position than Florida and their rules appear to generally demonstrate a better understanding of how online relationships are analogous to real world relationships.The Maryland Judicial Ethics Committee appears to have taken a position that generally follows California, New York, Kentucky, Ohio, and South Carolina. [read post]
