Search for: "v. Oliver" Results 201 - 220 of 1,993
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2008, 7:34 pm
Sheffield City Council v Hazel St Clare Oliver LRX/146/2007 [links to PDF] This is a case which touches on an issue familiar to those involved with right to buy leases: replacement of windows by the landlord. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 4:09 am by Russ Bensing
A year and a half ago, in Oliver v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
As dedicated CAAFlog readers know, I have been suggesting that the cert petition in New v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:30 pm by legalinformatics
The advent of relatively cheap printing in the 19th Century, and its application to legal opinions after the decision in Wheaton v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:02 am by Jessica Smith
Guidance on how the court should approach an MPS application is set out in case law such as TL v ML, F v F (Maintenance Pending Suit) and White v White. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On January 28, 2011, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in the case of Oliver v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:19 am by Kent Scheidegger
"The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic," Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes famously wrote for the Supreme Court in Schenk v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 2:46 am by Amy Howe
” At Philly.com, Samantha Melamed reports that, in Pennsylvania, four “juvenile lifers” were “given new sentences as a consequence of Montgomery v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:35 am by Audrey Ah-Kan, Olswang
Since Shell UK Ltd & Ors v Total UK Ltd & Or (a case concerning the Buncefield oil terminal fire, which was due to be heard from 5 to 7 April 2011) has now been settled, the Supreme Court will instead hear the appeal in Jivraj v Hashwani on 6 and 7 April 2011. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 7:34 am by INFORRM
The case of Economou v de Freitas ([2016] EWHC 1853 (QB)) was the first case to substantively consider in detail the new “public interest” defence since the Defamation Act 2013 came into force, clarifying that the Court will place a great deal of weight on whether the Defendant “reasonably believed” the publication was in the public interest and not just on whether it was a general matter of public interest. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 10:23 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Last year, I posted here that I found Justice Bushrod Washington's original notes on Corfield v. [read post]