Search for: "Bell v. Bell*"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 4,954
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 7:49 am
In finding that the employer did not have the requisite knowledge to fire the employee “because of” her disability, the district court relied on Hedberg v Indiana Bell Tel Co, Inc, in which the Seventh Circuit found that an employee cannot hold an employer liable under the ADA if the employer has no knowledge of the employee’s disability. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:39 pm
[4] Bell v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:49 am
And in Blythe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
If nothing else, he was consistent, except this time he took a pratfall onto the canvas, mere moments after the bell rang. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:03 am
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Friday, January 10, 2014:'Bell is not above the law,' says man awarded $21K for privacy breach Canada courting U.S. web giants in wake of NSA spy scandal Chicago law prof barred from campus for alleged angry comments claims disability right violation Protection Against Copyright Infringement Strengthened by SCC Robinson Case but at What CostRob Ford speaks favourably of marijuana decriminalizationA Canada Evidence… [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:10 am
Finding that a webpage containing the text of an arbitration agreement was enforceable, and that an AT&T employee who received notice of the agreement by email agreed to it when he accessed the webpage but did not opt-out by the deadline stated therein, a federal district court in Missouri granted AT&T’s motion to compel arbitration of his discrimination claims (Karzon v AT&T, Inc dba Southwestern Bell Telephone Co, Inc, January 7, 2014, Jackson, C). [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 5:29 am
Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 12:18 am
Still according to Publishers Weekly, the appeal could be complicated by the fact that the Second Circuit is already preparing to rule on a parallel case, the Authors Guild v HathiTrust [on which see here and here]. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 1:10 pm
And distributed it throughout the country through Crips and Bloods.The words "Nicaragua" and "80s" may perhaps ring a bell for you. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 7:07 am
On November 26, 2013, the Benefits Review Board issued its decision in Bell v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:06 pm
One of the key elements in proving a negligence claim in Alabama is establishing whether the offending party had a duty to the plaintiff. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:43 am
However, the motion for decertification was denied with respect to arguments that plaintiffs’ return to the garage at end of shift forced them to submit their time off-the-clock, concluded the court (Blakes v Illinois Bell Telephone Co dba AT&T Illinois, December 17, 2013, Kim, Y). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am
My first involvement in litigation centered on this question was in a case called Pearson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:48 pm
Applying these considerations to the case of a duty of care, it’s interesting to note the most recent argument in the FTC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
We covered that decision (see For Whom the Bell Tolls). [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
We covered that decision (see For Whom the Bell Tolls). [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
For example, in Warman v Fournier, a 2012 Federal Court of Canada decision, the court acknowledged the need for a broad approach to the news reporting purpose. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:12 pm
In Bell v Burson (402 U.S. 535) the Court acknowledged that the right to drive is a privilege. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:30 am
The case is Poquito Mas Licensing Corp. v. [read post]
