Search for: "CUSTODY OF S C" Results 2181 - 2200 of 4,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2014, 7:13 am by Robert Brammer
Please note that the topics of child custody and support will appear in a forthcoming guide. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Jamison Koehler
  Yes, that means my client will have to sit in custody a while longer. [read post]
27 May 2018, 2:54 pm by Steve Kalar
   Judge Smith tracks the Dean holding requiring minimal mens rea showings for enhanced sentencing under Section 924(c)(1)(A)(iii). [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:24 pm by Philip J. Berenz
My clients are shocked to learn that (a) people actually drive cars with no insurance - as in 0 insurance; (b) they were hit and injured by someone with a basic policy of only $25,000.00 of coverage (the minimum in Illinois at this time); and/or (c) the other person's insurance was just "rescinded" for fraud or misrepresentation in taking out the policy (aka - again - no insurance!). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:21 am by Alex Phipps
The court held that “Defendant was not in custody when he first voluntarily admitted he had inappropriately touched the victim[, and his] subsequent oral and written statements providing further details regarding Defendant’s actions were made after the proper administration of Miranda warnings and without a request for counsel. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 03918 (2d Dept.,2023) the parties had previously agreed to share custody of the child and to waive an award of child support from each other. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 3:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Bronx Child Custody Attorney can file necessary pleadings to divest the custody of the child from his abusive parent. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:38 pm by Danielle N. Craft
First, Judge Hey prohibited the defendant’s reliance on the previously non-disclosed discovery under Rule 37(c)(1). [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:38 pm by Danielle N. Craft
First, Judge Hey prohibited the defendant’s reliance on the previously non-disclosed discovery under Rule 37(c)(1). [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:38 pm by Danielle N. Craft
First, Judge Hey prohibited the defendant’s reliance on the previously non-disclosed discovery under Rule 37(c)(1). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 9:00 am
Notify any court already having taken jurisdiction in the minor's home state of the allegations; or C. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 6:42 am by Diana L. Skaggs
  CA found the additional parties to be jointed referenced in that statute would not be third-party creditors, but rather parties who may have custody rights to children of the parties. [read post]