Search for: "Case v. People" Results 2181 - 2200 of 51,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2009, 3:04 pm
There's no way the result in this case is crystal clear, and I could easily see a jury deciding there was reasonable doubt. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by INFORRM
In its judgment in the case of Handzhiyski v Bulgaria ([2021]  ECHR 283) the Fourth Section of the Court held, by a six-one majority, that convicting and fining a local politician who had placed a Santa Claus hat on a statute of a former Communist and put a red sack at its feet as part of a political and satirical protest was an unjustified interference with his right to freedom of expression under Article 10. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 11:23 pm by Shams Hirji
Jackson Women’s Health Org., which could be the case in which the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm by Julie Lam
In a 4-3 decision, affirming the Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:38 am by Michael DelSignore
The Supreme Court will be back in action next week, and will hear a case about the future of the exclusionary rule when it hears the arguments of Utah v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 3:40 pm
I previously noted some recent cases on design copyright infringement, including Barrett v Metricon. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
  This case was wholly unlike the case of Pieretti v Enfield London Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1104; [2011] PTSR 565 (which held that the section 49A duty complements a housing authority’s duties to the homeless under Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996). [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:17 am by Warren Gordon, Olswang LLP
While the Apportionment Act 1870 allows for rent payable in arrear to be apportionable (based on a day to day accrual), the famous case of Ellis v Rowbotham [1900] 1 QB 740 held that the Act does not apply to rent payable in advance. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:05 am by Sansone / Lauber Trial Lawyers
    The post $ 103,000.00 – L.M.S. v Travelers Insurance appeared first on Sansone, Sumner & Lauber. [read post]
24 May 2009, 1:23 am
On Friday, May 22, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court denied applications for leave to appeal in two cases, and vacated its previous order granting leave in People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]