Search for: "Collins v. THE STATE"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 2,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2024, 7:05 am
State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm
Osborne that held a state prisoner does not have a due process right to obtain evidence from the state that could establish his actual innocence. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Fifth Circuit: Which was unintentional, so qualified immunity. Allegation: The day after losing election, state judge asks Collin County, Tex. prosecutors to investigate the challenger who beat him and "find a crime. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:57 pm
” Senator Susan Collins, a Republican from Maine, agreed, suggesting “it’s more appropriate for members of the Senate to give advice to the president. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
In early 2001, Heartland acquired Collins & Aikman Corp. and in Jan. 2003, caused Collins & Aikman to enter into a Side Letter and Framework with the Union (Collins & Aikman agreement). [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 10:41 pm
She had a strategic plan, modeled on how Thurgood Marshall went after racial discrimination leading to Brown v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:59 am
Doug Collins and Warren Davidson. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
Standard of ReviewTrial courts have always been afforded broad discretion in the granting of new trials, and may exercise such discretion “in the interests of justice and fairness” without stating any other reason. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:58 pm
The EPA rules announced today are the next step forward in carrying out the Supreme Court’s landmark 2007 decision, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
There has been significant commentary and conjecture over the decision in R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor (see our post or read the judgment). [read post]
3 May 2013, 11:16 am
Interestingly, the Volokh Conspiracy notes that the New York Supreme Court held today in Bezio v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:26 pm
Seitz v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 7:33 am
Collins, 506 U.S 390, 400 (1993). [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm
Clearly, big attention-grabbing cases such as Lloyd Rayney v The State of Western Australia (damages of $1.8m, including damages for economic loss, with another $773,866 in interest), Rebel Wilson v Women’s Day, Women’s Weekly, New Weekly and OK! [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:14 pm
On 14 November 2018, the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Warner-Lambert Company LLC (Appellant) v Generics (UK) Ltd t/a Mylan and another (Respondents) [2018] UKSC 56. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am
Wearing religious symbols and the CJEU To the surprise of some (though not to us because we’d read the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Collins) on Tuesday, in OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22 the CJEU held that the ban on municipal employees wearing signs or dress indicating their religious or philosophical beliefs imposed by the Commune d’Ans, in Belgium, was not incompatible with their rights under the EU Charter: we noted the case… [read post]
