Search for: "Day v. United States Of America"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 3,397
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2013, 4:35 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 11:02 am
Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, The Mexican American Grocers Association, The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, National Black Chamber of Commerce, and The National Federation of Independent Business. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
I'd like to point out that the defendant in this case was essentially the United States of America (aka Big Brother - you know, the one with the NSA scandal a few months back?). [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 2:29 pm
In Redmond v Redmond, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 3821595 (C.A.7 (Ill.)) [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
” As simply stated in Seran v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 11:12 pm
s Avaulta alone in the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 1:22 pm
Case scheduled Sep 11, 2013 10:00 a.m. in United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Howard T. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
Hopefully it is accurate:JAPAN ESTATE AND GIFT TAX TREATYUNITED STATES- JAPAN ESTATE, INHERITANCE, AND GIFT TAX TREATY[Signed 4/16/54]ARTICLE I(1) The taxes referred to in the present convention are: (a) In the case of the United States of America: The Federal estate and gift taxes. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:21 am
United Mine Workers of America, 404 U.S. 528, 538 n. 10, 92 S.Ct. 630, 30 L.Ed.2d 686 (1972) . [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:13 pm
An employer who failed to complete an I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification Form within three days of an employee’s start date commits a substantive violation for which the good faith defense is not available to mitigate the assessed fine, according to a recent ruling from the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO) of the Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review, in United States of America v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 3:12 am
NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including but not limited to title V and section 604 of the 1974 Act, do proclaim that: (1) The designation of Bangladesh as a beneficiary developing country under the GSP is suspended on the date that is 60 days after the date this proclamation is… [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
Bush brought together Republicans and Democrats as he signed a 25-year extension of a law exemplifying "our continued commitment to a united America where every person is valued and treated with dignity and respect." [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am
Yesterday was a landmark day in America. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
The judgment orders the United States to pay money that it would not disburse but for the court’s order. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Just as Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:00 am
A copy of United States of America v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm
Think of United States v. [read post]
