Search for: "Dean v. Dean" Results 2181 - 2200 of 4,251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2013, 6:43 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Flanagan’s [Queen's law Dean] views. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:38 pm by immigrationprof
As Dean Kevin Johnson blogged yesterday, the 5th Circuit held en banc in Villas at Parkside v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:41 pm by Jeff Gamso
  They're really one.Heins takes her title from Felix Frankfurter's concurring opinion in Weiman v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
While Congress exercises considerable control over the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, since the landmark decision in Marbury v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Laura Dean continued her online Cairo diary, chronicling the goings-on in Egypt. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
-M.Th.D. ten Napel,  Leiden Law School, Institute for Public Law, Section of Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Netherlands, “Religious Pluralism, Eastern Ethnical Monism and Western ‘Civic Totalism’” Nicolae V. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:51 am by Jonathan Witmer-Rich
  The first court decision discussing a delayed notice search warrant—that is to say, a covert search actually authorized in advance by a magistrate—is United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 9:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
In addition, Steve commented on Justice Thomas’s dissent in Lanus ex rel. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:07 am by Joy Waltemath
Allegedly in response, that year the dean rated him as “marginal” in one area during his annual evaluation, which affected his merit raise. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:29 am by Emily Lonergan
I contemplated a post about the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:08 pm by Eduardo Penalver
 The argument that it does will run into Employment Division v. [read post]