Search for: "Does 1-24" Results 2181 - 2200 of 16,595
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2018, 7:40 am
            Does this make sense to you? [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
State, 920 So. 2d 21, 24 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (internal citation omitted). [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:16 am
  Well, in a reference about Article 3(d), it is really all about Article 1(b). [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:25 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Indeed, in the face of massive retrogression in the Visa Bulletin, the Biden administration does have the authority to move the dates for filing to current. [read post]
15 May 2017, 7:56 am by Derek T. Muller
It does not include clerkships obtained by students after graduation; it only includes clerkships obtained by each year's graduating class.I included some schools that had only one or two year's worth of data, like the separate Penn State schools. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:15 am
Until he does so, Congress must rein him in. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
” (G 2/07 [page 70, lines 10 to 12]). [26] The process of claim 1 does not comprise a step of breeding an animal and none of its steps involves any crossing. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am by Unknown
"4- As the Supreme Court explained in its judgment dated 24 March 2010 the Aviation Regulations are part of a wider complex of legislation requiring paid annual leave, starting with a general requirement introduced by Directive 93/104/EC ("the Working Time Directive"). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am by Kader Kadem
"4- As the Supreme Court explained in its judgment dated 24 March 2010 the Aviation Regulations are part of a wider complex of legislation requiring paid annual leave, starting with a general requirement introduced by Directive 93/104/EC ("the Working Time Directive"). [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 4:52 am
The SI provides a new subsection, s. 77(10), which states that s. 77(1) does not apply to unitary patents. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 7:57 am
The proposition is based on the following: 1. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In response, the applicant amended the claims (February 24, 2010).A first telephone consultation took place on March 15, 2010, wherein the Examiner suggested certain further amendments of claim 1.On May 27, 2010, the applicant filed amended claims; the amendments, however, did not correspond to what the Examiner had suggested.There was a second telephone consultation on June 9, 2010. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:54 am
As regards the meaning of "pending application" in R 25(1) EPC 1973, one interpretation is given in the Information from the EPO (OJ EPO 2002, 112). [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 7:21 am by Bob Kraft
Department of Energy (DOE), as a rule of thumb, you can assume that every 5 mph you drive over 60 mph will cost you 7 percent more for gasoline. [read post]