Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 2181 - 2200 of 4,618
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2016, 1:58 pm by Nikki Siesel
Applicant was refused registration for two marks: (1) JAWS in standard characters and (2) JAWS DEVOUR YOUR HUNGER in standard characters. [read post]
15 May 2016, 1:58 pm by Nikki Siesel
Applicant was refused registration for two marks: (1) JAWS in standard characters and (2) JAWS DEVOUR YOUR HUNGER in standard characters. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
’  He does not discuss the extensive Strasbourg jurisprudence concerning the balancing of Article 8 and Article 10 rights but, apparently, favours the US approach of granting unlimited freedom to the press. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:41 am by Robin Shea
QUESTION 5: You and Sven, age 41, have decided to part company. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 Realizing this risk does not fit easily within protections afforded by traditional insurance, the insurance industry has created and brought to market a variety of cyber-risk policies providing both first-party loss and third-party liability coverage. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:09 am by Bill Marler
Long-Term and Permanent Injury Although a minority of botulism patients eventually recovers their pre-infection health, the majority does not. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 2:09 pm by Alex R. McQuade
  The political situation in Iraq does not look too promising. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:51 am by Cyrus Farivar
On Thursday, the Supreme Court passed the proposed change to Rule 41 and sent it to Congress on Thursday, which will have until December 1 to modify, reject, or defer the proposal. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:09 am by Broc Romanek
With two Commissioners not sitting, does it take a majority of the three to get something passed? [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:09 am by Broc Romanek
With three Commissioners not sitting, does it take a majority of the three to get something passed? [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:48 am by John Hopkins
This subsection does not prevent a physician licensed under chapter 458 or chapter 459 or a dentist licensed under chapter 466 who submits a verified written expert medical opinion from being subject to denial of a license or disciplinary action under s. 458.331(1)(oo), s. 459.015(1)(qq), or s. 466.028(1)(ll). [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Taxpayers also should be advised to contact the pass-through entity if and when an expected Schedule K-1 does not appear. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]