Search for: "GRAY v. GRAY" Results 2181 - 2200 of 2,724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
The President of the Law Society of BC defended Justice Gray, saying she “applied the law based on the evidence before her”.[3] In contrast, in a thorough review of the decision, Lori Chambers, Deb Zweep and Nadia Verrelli criticized the court, arguing that the court did have enough information to see the pattern of coercive control.[4] Justice Gray erred on the side of hope that Mr. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court also heard argument in the case of John Doe v Reed. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
On 23 July 2010 Mr Justice Stadlen gave judgment striking out the cliam in Kaschke v Gray, ([2010] EWHC 1907 (QB)). [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by INFORRM
   Another case brought by Ms Kaschke was dealt with by Stadlen J on 29 March 2010, Kaschke v Gray [2010] EWHC 690 (QB) The case of Baturina v Times Newspapers (see the decision of Eady J [2010] EWHC  696 (QB)) is the subject of a comment on the Hold the Front Page website by Nigel Hanson of solicitors Foot Anstey. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am by INFORRM
After hearing the strike out application in the case of Kaschke v Gray, (see judgment [2010] EWHC 690 (QB)) Mr Justice Stadlen reserved judgment this week. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by INFORRM
Events We draw attention to the Inforrm, Media Standards Trust, Gray’s Inn event on 11 January 2011: “Libel Reform: in the Public’s Interest? [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
to pay 23% ongoing royalty for future infringement: Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
Hulu, LLC (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) District Court Delaware: Use of the terms ‘charge’ ‘recharger’ and ‘connector’ do not render claim indefinite: Intermec Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On 11 May 2018 Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Reid v Newsquest (Midlands South) Ltd. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
" Matter of S.G., W.G., Jr., Children in Need of Services; William Gray, Sr. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The notion that M’Culloch v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]