Search for: "HARDING v. HAND" Results 2181 - 2200 of 6,601
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Deputy Assistant Secretaries of State Patrick Murphy and Marc Storella will testify alongside V. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 12:03 pm
 Once you do that, qualified immunity is hard to win. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 7:00 am by Sam Brunson
That’s what the Supreme Court did in Welsh v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
The Working Group for Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises traditionally presents a report to the UN General Assembly a few weeks before organizing its Forum on Business and Human Rights. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:59 pm
On the other hand, myriad communities along with local and national organizations around the world engage in campaigns, litigation, negotiations, and information politics aimed at preventing and redressing corporate violations of human rights. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:47 pm by Amy Howe
When the justices took the bench this morning to hear oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]