Search for: "Holiday v. State"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 2,357
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2008, 2:30 pm
Happy holidays! [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision this week in State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Protection in the United States of Foreign Trademarks That Are Well Known But Not Used There, 98 TMR 1379 (November - December 2008).Bukhara Grill, NYCAmicus Brief of the International Trademark Association in Starbucks Corporation v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 9:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:49 am
Then there was State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 6:20 am
France and Kervanci v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 8:01 am
California is among the states that have a high number of ATV accident related fatalities. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 4:10 pm
So you haven't finished your holiday shopping yet? [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:49 pm
How does a traditional state holiday on October 31st affect the timeliness of an appeal that was due on October 27th? [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
o SCOTUS docket hereBowie v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:04 pm
Here's a pre-holiday case that's interesting on a lot of levels.First, it involves yet another elected official from Alaska who's allegedly corrupt and criminally investigated and/or charged. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
StringerFeaturing Special Guests NY State Senator Tom Duane and NY State Assemblymember Daniel J. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 9:07 pm
United States and Danforth v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:45 am
Boron, of Salem, Ohio, wrote that state-recognized holidays could be read to include such obscure events as Hubert J. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 6:45 am
(See prior posting and this background.)Now in Merkos L'Inyonei Chinuch, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 7:00 pm
(Furia v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 12:54 pm
" The Court of Appeal in Evangelista v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:52 am
Nova Design Build, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
