Search for: "In Matter of Stewart" Results 2181 - 2200 of 2,329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2017, 1:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
Say a student is in a professional education program at a college — law school, medical school, nursing school, business school, school of education or the like. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:08 am by Emma Snell
Phil Stewart reports for Reuters. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:55 am by MBettman
Belinda appealed, arguing that the trial court erred as a matter of law and abused its discretion in ordering the release of her personal and confidential medical records. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
Well done, BCA can favor major regulations, such as phasing out CFCs, reducing particulate matter air pollution, and sound climate policy.[12] The challenge is to get beyond “tunnel vision,”[13] and to counteract “disregard” of impacts and affected subgroups.[14]Assessing all important impacts helps overcome these cognitive limitations, and the “omitted voice” of underrepresented subgroups, by pressing policy makers to think more holistically and… [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:20 am by Emma Snell
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Paul Rosenzweig
DRAFT Statement for HPSCI As an initial matter, two caveats are in order. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 12:35 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
It didn’t matter that his buddy was bigger and rounder than the drawing indicated, and wore mutton-chop sideburns. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
The top defendants in each case—Oath Keepers founder Elmer Stewart Rhodes III and former Proud Boys chairman Enrique Tarrio—were each identified by name at least 20 times at those hearings. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:16 am by Matthew Kahn
Writing for the majority, Justice Potter Stewart held that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places, and in his concurrence, Justice Harlan fleshed out a test for identifying a “reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 11:30 am
  When we saw that there was a separate “Metallosis Motion,” we expected it would be a challenge to whether there is a defined clinical entity called “metallosis” that can be diagnosed just be looking at it, no matter how experienced the surgeon making the diagnosis is. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Featured panelists and podcast participants include Stewart Baker, Edward Schwartz and Ed Felten. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
In this regard, some have worried about limitations on the use of ground forces.[2] Others have argued the problem is chiefly the three-year proposed sunset provision.[3] Still others have voiced concerns about both.[4] Yet both concerns are actually misplaced, at least as a legal matter, and for largely the same reasons. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Clark, 504 N.W.2d 292, 300 (Neb. 1993) ("filing a personal injury claim waives the physician-patient privilege as to all the information concerning the health and medical history relevant to the matters which plaintiff has put at issue"); Pearce v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Are Censures of Politicians a Form of Free Speech or a Threat to It? [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
A senator who filibusters the government’s secrecy is compared in iconic terms to Jimmy Stewart. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Most of the books you mention (like The Brethren too, for that matter) were written while the Burger Court was still ongoing. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Be very careful to make sure a Hawaii doctor knows an interview is voluntary, do not get into irrelevant matters, etc. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
House Votes to Refer Santos Matter to Ethics Panel MSN – Lindsay McPherson (Roll Call) | Published: 5/17/2023 The House voted to refer a resolution from Democrats that would expel U.S. [read post]
  Later, a federal judge reviewing the document and emails discussing the matter between Trump and his staff concluded that “The emails show that President Trump knew that the specific numbers of voter fraud were wrong but continued to tout those numbers, both in court and to the public” and found that the emails were “sufficiently related to and in furtherance of a conspiracy to defraud the United States. [read post]