Search for: "In Re CAL" Results 2181 - 2200 of 5,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2023, 3:27 pm
” (In re Marriage of Skelley (1976) 18 Cal.3d 365, 368.) [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:11 am
Sortino of the Los Angeles Superior Court, will be sitting Pro-Tem in Division Eight until May 31, 2017.Today's DJ features Gary Watt on Frivolous Appeals, in which he discusses the classic In re Marriage of Flaherty (1982) 31 Cal.3d 637, and concludes: It's complete lack of objective merit that makes an appeal frivolous. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:31 am
" (Flaherty, supra, 31 Cal.3d at p. 650, italics added.) [read post]
10 May 2014, 9:16 am by Patrick Goold
Yet, this appears to stand in some conflict to an older Californian case, In re Marriage of Worth, 195 Cal. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:22 pm
 Justice Cuéllar tends to be a relatively heavy questioner, and once again, he is an outlier as far as the rule we're testing. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 1:48 pm
If you're going to lose in the Court of Appeal, I think this is how you want to lose. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:02 am
In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (2008).Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. [read post]