Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 2181 - 2200
of 18,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2022, 4:27 pm
Particularly if they're not 100% sure they'll win the negligence claim. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:45 pm
Plus, we're O'Melveny. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:11 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 1:08 pm
” [Citations]; see also People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:57 am
In King v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:29 am
But the 29th Annual Edward V. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
And for us, as we wait with them — continuing our struggle for justice. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:56 am
So far, my impression is that the court could easily decide either way, but what would be in the interest of justice is that Samsung gets the chance to make its "article of manufacture" case before a new jury (a jury would be needed in any event for the re-retrial, so justice would be available at almost no incremental cost here). [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 1:24 pm
Justice McDonald is right. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 6:48 pm
But that he nonetheless appreciates the opening two paragraphs of Justice Currey's opinion:"This case resolves two obscure and previously unaddressed state constitutional issues: Does article I, section 16 of the California Constitution guarantee the right to a jury trial for (1) nominal statutory damages claims, and/or (2) claims for attorneys’ fees, under the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA) (Civ. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:06 pm
You're going to be hard pressed to persuade someone that, at this point, taking a 28-year old off the street until he's 60 or so (assuming time off for good behavior) is unconstitutionally excessive.On an only tangentially related note, I had to reflect on my own mental competence when I stumbled over a portion of Justice Murray's opinion. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 12:08 pm
Take one-tenth of one percent of that from a dude on the street and you're looking at serious prison time. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 12:46 pm
Once we're there, it seems more important to me to expand upon the analysis rather than a (somewhat distracting) discourse on the particular path through which we wound up in our present predicament. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 1:01 pm
He appeals, but the Court of Appeal affirms.On a minor note, one of the downsides of cranking out tons of opinions every year is that they're not all perfect. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 10:00 am
As Justice Snauffer says:"The facts are simple. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:56 am
No: Justice DeWine Justice Fischer did not participate in this case. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Hurst v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 1:14 pm
We’re getting used to change around here. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 4:58 pm
See, e.g., Leventhal v. [read post]
