Search for: "Jones v. District Court" Results 2181 - 2200 of 2,826
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
The news continues to be dominated by Coronavirus, with the Courts starting to become affected. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 9:17 am by Lev Sugarman
Barr, ruling that district courts do not have the inherent authority to publicly release grand jury material. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am by Matthew Scarola
” The case is a follow-up to the Court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 12:48 pm by John Ross
The district court and a panel of Fifth Circuit judges decline to dissolve the decree. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
App. 2006) (approving jury instruction based on Restatement §908).District of Columbia:  Destefano v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:42 am by Jeff Welty
The district court judge denied the motion to suppress, the defendants were convicted on all counts, and they appealed. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 4:12 am
Frankel, Laura Brookover & Stephen Satterfield A recent case in the Northern District of California, Fraley v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
This uncertainty was acknowledged by the Florida Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:27 am
Oct. 15, 2008), a unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment granted to Bayer by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, holding that Bayer’s settlement of patent litigation with a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer did not violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
  (IP Osgoode) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Second District Court declares Qui Tam provisions of false marking statute unconstitutional: Rogers v. [read post]
3 May 2008, 7:15 am
The lead case is Commissioner of Insurance v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit should nonetheless have heard Sudan’s limitations defense asserted through its timely, direct appeal; and (5) whether the undisputed fact of civil war, internal strife and partitioning of Sudan into two counties constitutes excusable neglect or extraordinary circumstances for vacatur under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]