Search for: "Legal Writing Prof"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 2,261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2021, 12:06 am
We think they need legal writing, they need legal doctrine. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:06 am
We think they need legal writing, they need legal doctrine. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
Prof. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am
The Canadian approach did not include “confusingly similar” trademark goods, recognizing that such goods are not counterfeit and that requiring border guards (who rarely have legal training) to make exceptionally difficult judgments about whether imported goods violate the law is bad policy. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
No matter, in my mind it’s really a question for the legal scholars anyway, isn’t it? [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:35 pm
" (pp. 8-9) Footnote 5, which immediately follows this quote, approvingly cites Prof. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Given that I am not writing a series of full-scale articles, I fear that I cannot do justice to all of the essays (or, perhaps, to any of them), but I will try my best to focus on some of the most important themes. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm
Viet Dinh, and one by Prof. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
Unsurprisingly, I think Prof. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
For example, Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye writes for the plurality: “We also dispute Justice Cuéllar’s characterizations of various aspects of this opinion. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
-Don’t just like, also retweet. (8) @TheBudgetGuy – Stan Collender – Forbes contributor, Georgetown U. adjunct prof, author of The Guide To The Federal Budget, stand-up comedian wannabee, all tweets my own Tax-Related Orgs (Twitter list): (9) @ABATaxSection – ABA Tax Section – The ABA Section of Taxation (10) @AICPA – AICPA – We’re the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:20 am
Only thing is, for all their victims there will likely never be justice.Thank you for your insightful writing. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
& Prof. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:20 am
The problem is that the inevitability of factual, legal, and moral error gives us a system that we know must wrongly kill some defendants, a system that fails to deliver the fair, consistent, and reliable sentences of death required by the Constitution.I'm laboring this because it points toward one of the two reasons why the book is annoying. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
These three questions shed light on the nature and role of secondary rules of recognition in transnational regimes and on the distinction between relative legality (what a legal system considers to be law, its own or that of other systems) and absolute legality (what a neutral observer considers to be law). [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
Fortunately for me, Prof. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:00 pm
That is because if Romney is elected president, his views on the acceptability of aggressive tax strategies of questionable legality will matter. [read post]
1 May 2010, 5:25 pm
I am bringing all of this up now after having read an excellent Chinese Law Prof post, entitled, "Debt Hostages. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 4:29 pm
This, despite an opinion from the Department of Justice, backed up by testimony from the Minister of Justice (himself a distinguished legal scholar), explicitly dismissing claims that any provisions of the Bill would violate Charter freedoms. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 10:51 am
For example, California’s chatbot law (Bus. and Prof. [read post]
