Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
Copyright is like theft and, on the authority of a dictum of Lord Browne-Wilkinson's in Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC [1996] AC 669, stolen property is subject to a constructive trust in favour of the rightful owner. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 4:41 am
Lord ed., 4th ed. 2004). [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
Managing Intellectual Property had a bit of a scoop this week, picking up very quickly on the news that Lord Younger of Leckie, the current Minister for Intellectual Property in the United Kingdom, announced that his government had no plans to introduce an IP Tsar along the lines of the apparently successful Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 6:34 am
(“Kabushiki judgment”) and Infosys Technologies Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
Tessa Jowell complained to the PCC about an article in the Daily Mail which stated that Jowell had been criticised by the Cabinet Secretary in 2006 over an alleged payment to her husband by Silvio Berlusconi. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
As Lord Justice Leveson notes, the question of the relationship between the right of reply and Article 10 was considered by the Court of Human Rights in the case of Melnychuk v Ukraine (Decision of 5 July 2005). [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
The Court of Appeal was bound by the House of Lords decision in Hammersmith v Monk. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
The Court of Appeal was bound by the House of Lords decision in Hammersmith v Monk. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
However, the Apple v Samsung cases pending before several national courts in Europe expose the inherent limitations of such provisions. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
Lord Justice Kitchin rejected these submissions. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 12:48 pm
On the other hand the House of Lords in Scandecor Developments AB v Scandecor Marketing AB seemed rather inclined to validate bare licensing. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:21 am
(See Rogers v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
My involvement in the upcoming Vilardell v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 3:27 pm
An example of such a decision was given in Lord Justice Warrington in Short v Poole Corporation [1926] as ‘a red-haired teacher being dismissed because she had red hair’. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:56 pm
Such, also, was the Declaration of Right presented by the Lords and Commons to the Prince of Orange in 1688, and afterwards thrown into the form of an act of parliament called the Bill of Rights. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The PCC has published Lord Hunt’s contribution here. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am
But the substance of Lord Lester’s objection depends on the judgment of Mr Justice Eady in the case of Mosley v News Group Newspapers ([2008] EWHC 1777 (QB)). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]
