Search for: "MATTER OF K A B"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 2,720
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
Re (b):[2.3] The second point raised by the appellant is that it was denied the right to be heard (cf. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:00 pm
In this opinion it was held inter alia that the subject-matter of claim 1 did not involve an inventive step […]. b) In its reply dated 18.09.2008 the appellant filed amended application documents. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:49 pm
The present matter concerns the claim construction. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:01 pm
In particular the board has examined whether the subject-matter of claims 11 and 12 has a technical character because the claimed program, when run on a computer, causes a “further technical effect” (see T 1173/97 [9.4]). [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:06 pm
R.C. 4511.19(a)(1)(b) to (a)(1)(k) make it illegal to operate a vehicle with prohibited concentrations of alcohol in one’s blood, breath, or urine. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 5:25 am
(b) In any event, a petition under Article 227 cannot be called a writ petition. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
The present decision goes into some detail to explain why a request for postponement (well, as we shall see, the Board would not use this word) of oral proceedings (OPs) could (should) have been refused. [1] Article 15(2) RPBA provides as follows: “A change of date for OPs may exceptionally be allowed in the Board’s discretion following receipt of a written and reasoned request made as far as in advance of the appointed date as possible. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 11:01 am
The board therefore also concurs with the ISA that both the identified invention relating to gene ABCC1 and the invention defined by the applicant with respect to the CDH1 gene […] are subject-matter of the claimed invention. [15] In addition the board notes that the wordings of the claims do not mention statistical methods (e.g. stepwise logistic regression analysis) to analyse the expression levels of genes that had been implicated in ovarian cancer in a sample isolated from a… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:50 pm
S-K). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:09 am
B. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
m, in an ultrahigh-performance concrete in order to improve the fire resistance of the concrete, the amount of organic fibres being such that their volume ranges between 0.1 and 3% of the volume of the concrete after curing and the concrete having a characteristic 28-day compressive strength of at least 120 MPa, a characteristic flexural strength of at least 20 MPa and a spread value in the unhardened state of at least 150 mm, these values being given for a concrete stored and maintained at… [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
In steps B to E each the following mental activities are performed based on the application of mathematical methods: (i) forming a data set (step B ), (ii) establishing a distribution set of probability distributions (step C ), (iii) applying the first reaction value to each pertinent probability distribution (step D) and (iv) determining the genotype based on the data obtained from step D (step E). [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
(b) No reference is made in D1 to the mask subtraction step. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
The GAO study will examine matters such as the frequency of accounting misstatements and investor confidence in the integrity of financial statements so, in Senator Dodd’s words, Congress ``can understand its effects. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:41 am
K. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 3:50 am
This is, incidentally, not the case at the Lyndon B. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 11:01 am
A 84 stipulates that the claims shall define the matter for which protection is sought. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm
On October 8, 2010, Chancellor William B. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:52 am
It matters because the allegations in the suit matter. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
However, the Court of Appeal decided that a) the matter was of wider public interest and b) given that the appellant’s current AST was shortly to end, there was a [surely slim] possibility that Enfield would find that the chain of causation hadn’t been broken and that the appellant and his wife remained intentionally homeless, as per their review decision under appeal. [read post]
