Search for: "Martin v. State" Results 2181 - 2200 of 4,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2014, 8:24 am by Clara Spera
The Department of Justice filed a motion yesterday that would block plaintiffs in Klayman v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 6:28 am by Neil Cahn
Take the April 28, 2022 decision of the Appellate Division, Third Department, in Martin v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm by INFORRM
* Cripps v Vakras – $450,000 ($100,000 aggravated damages) * Pedavoli v Fairfax Media – $350,000 – hard copy and online * Polias v Ryall – $340,000 (Facebook and gossip) * North Coast Children’s Home Inc v Martin – $250,000 * Tassone v Kirkham – $176,408.81 * Fisher v Channel Seven Sydney – $125,000 (Today Tonight) * Visscher… [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
Sheets     Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 08a0412p.06  Martin v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 11:43 am
This places US judges in the difficult position of acting as cultural gatekeepers, given that they have the final say as to what is worthy  of such protection.Judges themselves have noted  the challenge in being asked to rule on the protection of works of recognized stature [see Martin v City of Indiana(1999) ; Cheffins v Stewart(2016)]. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, similar rules apply in many states to private schools more generally; if a state bans discrimination in admission by such schools, which many states do, that brings with it similar restrictions on speech that creates a "hostile environment" (which would likely violate the First Amendment when applied to curriculum, see Runyon v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Marcovitz, (Dalhousie Law Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 153-176, 2009).Dimitry Kochenov, On Options of Citizens and Moral Choices of States: Gays and European Federalism, (Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2009).Heather Kennedy, Pleasant Grove v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:38 am by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
Yesterday, the panel of Judges Martin, Cole, and Clay decided United States v. [read post]