Search for: "Matter of Kennedy"
Results 2181 - 2200
of 4,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2008, 9:22 am
Nor does it matter if the motivation in passing the law is completely partisan. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
*** JUSTICE BREYER: Because I would like to go back to Justice Kennedy’s question, and this is only me speaking. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:03 am
Kennedy wrote. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
New lawyers offer their expert opinions on every matter of law on the internet, but few have ever tried a serious felony to verdict before a jury. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:30 am
Justice Kennedy wrote separately to underscore the appropriateness of the accommodation. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:45 am
Justice Kennedy: That’s sweeping. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
According to a recent FOX News poll, seventy percent of voters indicate that it would not matter to them if there were no Justice with a Protestant background. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:35 am
†Justice Kennedy said. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
Fallon and her staff also work with the Justices and their chambers on the text of the opinions themselves, not on substantive matters but on “style” issues like words, and citations. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:22 pm
A violation of the law doesn’t hinge on what you say, the Court explained; all that matters is where you say it. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 11:17 am
Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in Caperton. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:09 am
The matter was tried non-jury to New York City Civil Court Judge Tanya R. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Justice Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Sotomayor, wrote a statement regarding the denial of certiorari. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:32 pm
still belongs to Kennedy. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
 At least Justice Sotomayor expressed concern regarding applying a rigid exclusive test, in that potential patentable subject matter would be excluded from the patenting process. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
Four defendants (Kennedy, Chaiet, Cohen, Andrei) were arrested earlier today and will make their initial appearances before U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:35 am
Justice Breyer said it was so open-ended that no member of Congress could ask any government official to look into the private matter of interest for a political donor. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:11 am
It was not until the contested election of 2000 that the Supreme Court was expected to resolve the matter. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
Four defendants (Kennedy, Chaiet, Cohen, Andrei) were arrested earlier today and will make their initial appearances before U.S. [read post]
5 May 2021, 4:03 am
” Some prawfs object, arguing that it “implicates matters of academic freedom and free speech” when it precludes a prawf or student from quoting a decision. [read post]
