Search for: "Matter of Lee v Lee" Results 2181 - 2200 of 2,325
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
Ohio County, Indiana, et al (NFP) In the Matter of R.W. and M.W. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:27 am
Dismissed.NFP criminal opinions today (3): Jerome Lee Fine v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Lee, No. 06-4933 In a prosecution for drug-related offenses wherein defendant entered a plea agreement, appeal of sentence is dismissed where the appeal waiver set forth in defendant's plea agreement was valid and enforceable. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 12:19 am
***Note the post on Patently-O about Microsoft Corp. v. z4 Tech. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
Al Arian appeared before the grand jury and relied on the "no-grand jury cooperation" promise, Judge Lee held him in contempt of court, and he wa [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:19 am
 Followup on Joe South story.This AP story has updates on developments in the case of a man killed in an accident involving a client of Tim Balducci, Darron Lee Minor. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
Now, opposite sides in the Supreme Court case testing the scope and meaning of that Amendment — the case that comes up for argument next Tuesday morning — have taken their turn at reading the history as a matter of legal advocacy. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Most consumers agree that intellectual property law is essential to ensure that creators of inventions, ideas, designs, services and the like are rewarded for their creativity and to promote the continuation of such creations.[1] In order to grant creators with the incentive to continue creating, such creators must be equipped with the satisfaction of knowing that their creations will not be transformed into cheap imitations which will inevitably compete with their own original creations. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
For the reasons set forth below, the district court's order is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion. 08a0107p.06 USA v. [read post]